The interlocutor is concerned not only do many local authorities cancel events unnecessarily, affirming that they violate health and safety standards, is also annoyed that many of these agencies have not even the right to exercise these powers in first lugar.Quiere eliminate the need for someone who always be responsible in law genuine, accidents as well as the stripes of the bureaucracy surrounding a basic occurrence as the Organization of a school trip.
He lists several examples of ' health and safety become crazy, ' including a master head refused to allow students to walk under a tree chestnut unprotected hats and other tocados.Otros examples that have come to light in recent years are an old woman who was asked to don a high visibility vest when he was working in his garden owned by Council and school in Bournemouth, who asked not to bring their own inflatables at a pool where they brought with them germs.
Lord Young, a former member of the Cabinet of Margaret Thatcher, told the Daily Mail:
"Frankly, if I want to do something stupid and breaking my leg or neck, is for me.""I don't need a Board to me should not be an idiota.puedo being an idiot all by myself."
"Gone to such extremos.Lo I've seen everywhere is a complete lack of common sense. people have been living in an alternate universe."
Compensation
By virtue of the new proposals, councils and local authorities could be made to pay damages to persons injured by negligence, rather than having the power of the general prohibition everything absolute or suggesting ridiculous get around of regulations that are not yet forms there.
Official OSH Hugh Robinson is skeptical of the reasons for local authorities on the prohibition of many sporting events, festivals, and games, saying that half the financial constraints of the time are the real reason so that many of them are prohibited or shut down.
Critics of the new Government proposals seem to suggest that the attack on health and safety is a form of placate baying crowds who want to see so many things that think they are 'wrong with the UK' be scrapped.
Say that, far from being a reasonable objective for derision, health regulations and security are an essential part of working life in the Kingdom Unido.Sin them, 20,000 people estimated that each year die workplace injury or occupational disease would be only the tip of the iceberg.
Work injuries occur daily and often because of employers having responsibilities adequately on serio.En industries such as construction and manufacturing of offices, where heavy machinery is an essential part of working life, these legal obligations not swept aside.
Thorough training and risk assessments shall be carried out regularly as posible.Nada is as sacred as human life and well-being, and employers to put their interests financial by security staff should rightly be caught and punished severely.
This brings us to the second stage of Young outline: he also wants to silence the companies advertising compensation, another idea which had met with crÃticas.La main line argument from the lobby anti-compensation is that this type of advertising encourages the spurious claims for minor injuries importancia.Esto may be true, but people seeking to make money for nothing knows where to look anyway, if or not see that a company advertising on television.
It is more relevant in the case of, say, workers who are injured due to the lax approach to their employers for their safety, need to have an avenue through which pursue a claim for compensation.
As said by Mr. Robertson, "the real scandal of health and safety in the UK is 20,000 people die each year due to injury or work-related diseases a serious consideration of the health and safety would put much more emphasis on dealing with this avoidable death and suffering".
Perhaps the Government to choose the least corporativizado and more action, where really needs is required.
No comments:
Post a Comment